Museum of Modern Art Sam Hilu Collection Womens Silk Jacket
Couture for Artists, Dead and Alive
For centuries, female artists were mostly absent from museums. Only as more work by women is organized into surveys and retrospectives, there is an odd improver — their wardrobe. Is this an deed of condescension … or a recognition that an creative person's style is inseparable from her fine art? Plus: Five designers imagine a working uniform for a female artist from history, exclusively for T.
THERE'S A WHITE silk blouse that Georgia O'Keeffe saved from her youth. Its delicacy is what makes information technology remarkable: sheer, with dozens of pintucks running down the shoulders and the neckline, all of information technology hand-sewn. At the bottom of the scooped neck, at the slight dip where the collarbones meet, is a bloom, made of the same silk cloth, pulled together with more pin tucks. Information technology resembles an orchid in summit bloom. The dorsum has been carefully patched and mended numerous times. It is like a work of art.
O'Keeffe loved her clothes. Her housekeeper remarked in 1974 to The New Yorker: "Miss O'Keeffe has a hundred dresses, but they're all alike, except that some are black instead of white." She was fond of soft suede Ferragamo flats in colors ranging from matte black to a recessive teal bluish. She liked depression heels from Saks Fifth Avenue, the tops sewn together with raised seams, resembling the veins of a foliage. She favored dresses cut on the bias, tunics and slip-over smocks that stopped just below the knee. When she visited New York City, she wore severe two-piece brim suits with crisp, collared blouses, and when she was dorsum dwelling house in the high desert of New Mexico, she wore bluish jeans, long-sleeved chambray shirts and simple cotton wrap dresses buckled at the waist. She preferred black when her picture was being taken, merely she liked color, too: pink, heaven blueish, navy, fifty-fifty red. She kept her pilus combed straight back, neatly twisted into a bun that resembled the contumely pin her friend, swain artist Alexander Calder, once gave her, with a coil shaped like the "O" of her proper name.
As one of America'due south most famous 20th-century artists, O'Keeffe has always served as a figurehead for unlike tribes and their respective agendas: a revered painter in the optics of feminists; a style icon to designers and fashion photographers. Her celebrity meant she was worshiped by those who were as interested in how she looked — and what that look represented — as in what she made. Whatever risks exist in objectifying O'Keeffe, her legacy reveals an artistry of self-presentation. A selection of her closet — along with 98 photographs of O'Keeffe, and a option of 36 paintings — was on display for the first fourth dimension at the Brooklyn Museum last year, in a retrospective of O'Keeffe'south life and work entitled "Georgia O'Keeffe: Living Modern."
Epitome
The designer, who is friends with Yiadom-Boakye, admires her willingness "to attack a canvas," no matter how nicely she's dressed. He wanted to give a woman who so understands the symbolism of beauty a uniform that evoked a sense of utility as well — an ocher-colored double-breasted woven denim jacket with deep trouser pockets where he imagined "her brushes sticking out."" class="css-r3fift" src="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/01/30/t-magazine/30tmag-uniforms-slide-H9VH/30tmag-uniforms-slide-H9VH-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp&disable=upscale" srcset="https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/01/30/t-magazine/30tmag-uniforms-slide-H9VH/30tmag-uniforms-slide-H9VH-articleLarge.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp 600w,https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/01/30/t-magazine/30tmag-uniforms-slide-H9VH/30tmag-uniforms-slide-H9VH-jumbo.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp 847w,https://static01.nyt.com/images/2018/01/30/t-magazine/30tmag-uniforms-slide-H9VH/30tmag-uniforms-slide-H9VH-superJumbo.jpg?quality=75&auto=webp 1693w" sizes="((min-width: 600px) and (max-width: 1004px)) 84vw, (min-width: 1005px) 60vw, 100vw" decoding="async" width="600" height="726">
Can clothes exist treated as a work of art? It depends, goes the slippery answer, on the artist — just the answer is more than likely a aye if the creative person is a woman. What an artist wears does matter; to be ane is, in a way, to transform the making of work into a operation. How your work is seen is important, as is how yous are viewed in the context of your work. Then there'due south the fact that the very idea of a solo museum prove for a adult female artist is still a relatively new one. Though the Museum of Modernistic Art presented its first retrospective of a living woman creative person in 1946 — a Georgia O'Keeffe show, actually — more often than non museums are belatedly in recognizing women, if they practise so at all. Louise Bourgeois had her first museum show, at MoMA, in 1982, at the age of 71. Today, an enormous gender imbalance in museum collections and programming remains. According to the National Museum of Women in the Arts, work by women artists accounts for but three to five percent of the permanent collections of major U.S. museums. In 2015, a study conducted by Maura Reilly, the executive director of the National University of Blueprint in New York, plant that women were represented in simply a small percentage of solo shows at American museums from 2007 to 2014. (Twenty-nine pct at the Whitney Museum, for instance, and 14 percentage at the Guggenheim in New York. Bleak as these numbers are, they're really an improvement: In 2000, the Guggenheim had zero solo shows by women.) But even as more and more than women are being shown at major institutions, their ephemera — and in particular, their wardrobe — ends upwardly right there alongside their piece of work. O'Keeffe isn't the simply gimmicky example. This summertime, the Victoria & Albert Museum in London will show Frida Kahlo'southward dresses likewise every bit her paintings. Louise Lawler, the lensman who studiously avoids being photographed herself, had her first MoMA retrospective last yr. In the last room of the showroom, there was a vitrine filled with everyday objects from her life: gallery invitations, envelopes, napkins, matchbooks — an attempt to piece together a biography, to contextualize the time and place in which the elusive Lawler made her work.
A holistic test of an creative person tin can offer a more than complete agreement of a creative life. Merely it feels precariously balanced, dangerously shut to crossing over into an intimate infinite: the personal. More than often than not, this kind of presentation results in a voyeurism reserved only for women. Will we e'er encounter one of Picasso's Breton shirts hanging next to his portrait of Marie-Therese? Dali'southward neckties adjacent to "The Burning Giraffe"? Jackson Pollock'due south paint-splattered pants that reveal the excess of "Autumn Rhythm"? Rembrandt'south beret? For women artists to announced in museums, information technology appears, alas, that the piece of work alone is not enough.
Image
Image
ART AND Fashion have always been competitive siblings, spring by a shared Deoxyribonucleic acid. Their kinship betrays natural similarities, a kind of simpatico for which we tin forgive their inevitable entanglements: Both are procedure driven, both aesthetically minded. Both extol an insider's world, and both, increasingly, are impressed with glory and the commercial power that buttresses their existence. Notwithstanding, style is inescapably made for the consumer, whereas fine art is a form of expression. The 2 realms have ever been associated with each other — Coco Chanel designed the costumes for the Ballets Russes in 1924 because she was enamored of Diaghilev'south circle and desired a closer clan with Picasso, who was a frequent collaborator — and, depending on your perspective, have a relationship that is either inspiring or exploitative. Designers drag themselves with fine art. Museums and institutions can heave omnipresence if they offering fashion. (125,000 visitors attended the O'Keeffe evidence.) On occasion, this relationship is charming, even sublime, as with the 1965 color-blocked dress Yves Saint Laurent designed, inspired by Piet Mondrian's dandy Modernist paintings. There can exist, as well, a chemical science that is unavoidable, as with the mixed-media artist Vanessa Beecroft, who, equally her stature rose in the tardily '90s, began to utilize both professional models and designer clothes in her works. (Her 2002 installation of a nude women army in thigh-high Helmut Lang stiletto boots is an unforgettable prototype.) Sometimes, though, the relationship is overtly commercial, equally with Maria Grazia Chiuri's recent appropriation of the writings of art historian Linda Nochlin at Dior, in which she presented models in T-shirts emblazoned with the title of Nochlin's landmark 1971 essay virtually gender inequality, "Why Have At that place Been No Great Women Artists?" (The answer was not offered on the runway.)
Past focusing on what remains from an creative person's life — her dresses, her earrings, an envelope scrawled with her handwriting — museums propose that way is an essential part of her practice. This isn't exactly incorrect. Consider the grim-faced conceptual artist Yayoi Kusama, who wears brilliant cherry-red wigs and muumuus in prints that match her obsessive dot paintings. In 1968, she launched a manner label, Kusama Fashion Company Ltd., sold at Kusama Corner in Bloomingdales, which was every bit much a conceptual lampooning of fashion every bit it was an earnest endeavor at commercialism. Her dresses were wildly, hilariously inappropriate, with cutouts where breasts or a bottom would announced. They challenged the sartorial conventions expected of women to be beautiful, sexualized beings. Or consider what the master of color, Sonia Delaunay, once said: "I e'er changed everything effectually me … I made my first white walls so our paintings would wait amend. I designed my article of furniture; I take done everything. I accept lived my art." For women artists of an before generation, the globe was non congenital to allow them to brand art easily, if at all. And on an elemental level, these outfits suggest that inventiveness is labor. Before Lucien Freud began painting, he would tear a square from a white sheet, tucking information technology into his waistband like an apron. At the end of the day, he would discard it as a rag. The muumuus, the smocks, the striped shirts — all are uniforms that express both the artist's individuality besides as the tedious, cog-similar procedure of producing art every day. Simply does this estimation threaten to overshadow the work? In that location exist philosophies (the Romantics, the Aesthetics) that embrace fine art as life, and life every bit art. Only when we permit fine art the privilege of speaking for itself, of being measured on its own terms, are we actually just allowing it when it'due south fabricated by men?
Non always — especially equally male artists take establish a manner into the domestic infinite. Donald Judd's New York home on Jump Street in Lower Manhattan is at present a museum and odd public monument to the artist, seemingly preserved exactly every bit he left information technology upon his death in 1994, downwardly to the flatware on the open kitchen shelves. Books that Judd read still line the library, pottery bowls he nerveless from Southern Italy are displayed around the business firm, even his fur coat hangs in 1 of the upstairs closets. He has a spectacular Dan Flavin sculpture that lights up the bedroom, and the about beautiful Frank Stella painting ("Gur II," 1967) that looks as if it were made exactly to Judd's specifications. These objects hint at his life, his friends. But like his sculptures — colossal geometric shapes without any sign of the human touch — the SoHo residence is surprisingly detached from the personal. As with Philip Johnson'southward Drinking glass House in New Canaan, Conn., the Judd home is an homage to Minimalism (a term he rejected) and to the kind of fine art that Judd championed: industrialized, empty, colorful. You circumvolve effectually Judd, but never find him.
Image
Compare that, then, to Casa Azul, the Mexico City dwelling where Frida Kahlo was raised. Information technology was established equally a museum by her husband, Diego Rivera, four years after she died from a lung infection at 47 while protesting against U.Southward. intervention in Guatemala. As a visitor, I strolled the grounds, admiring the plants, the bright blueish pigment on the walls, the water fountain where birds bathed. Inside, like everyone else, I looked at the gallery of her dress, at the easel where she painted, and on which an unfinished still life saturday. It is an intimate portrait of a woman who was a romantic, inimitably glamorous figure. Her marriage to Rivera propelled her into a circumvolve of international artists, and she modeled for both him too equally her father, who was a photographer. She represented an earthy bohemia, a woman who channeled her pain and crisis into her art. Her style has been replicated — flamboyant headpieces, bold floral prints and embroidered fabrics, and kooky, decorative jewelry — by everyone from Jean Paul Gaultier in his 1998 spring/summer collection to Beyoncé in a Halloween costume.
Just information technology wasn't until I arrived at Kahlo's bed, where she spent months at a time recuperating from her ailments (she suffered her whole life from injuries sustained every bit a teenager in a gruesome bus accident), that I felt I understood the unique quality of her existence as both adult female and creative person. Mirrors had been affixed overhead, and so that a supine Kahlo could regard herself; a custom easel had been built so that she could paint while lying down. The bed figured in her work; it was both a prison house and a life raft — in paintings, she depicted herself suffering in it, too as floating into the clouds, comatose.
Prototype
Peradventure THIS INTIMACY, palpably absent from Judd's home and work, says something about what we mostly wait from female artists and why museums insist on representing them differently from their male counterparts past unpacking their closet. Kahlo'due south bed reminded me of Tracey Emin'due south "My Bed," from 1998, a room-size, literal representation of Emin'south bed after she had suffered a suicidal low following a breakup. Tampons and cigarette butts litter the floor. The sheets are dirty. At that place is underwear with menstrual blood, an empty bottle of vodka. Its reception created an uproar. Many critics found information technology grotesque and facile, but I have always loved it for its pure abjection, and its ability to communicate interiority through inventory.
And that's the thing. The deviation between Judd and Kahlo is that nosotros await women to exist more personal, to mine their lives and to put information technology into their work. We call the work of women artists confessional; we assume it is autobiographical. Some artists have rigorously rejected this notion — Agnes Martin, so fiercely private, comes to mind (and indeed, her clothes were absent from her 2016 Guggenheim retrospective). But how else can a adult female creative person change the globe to suit her needs — to denote herself every bit neither object nor chattel — than with what is effectually her? Fifty-fifty if Kahlo'due south iconographic glory (her brows, her flower crowns) is frustratingly reductive, it'south still possible to see how such mode provides her with bureau, where her ain face and body are a main canvass. Similar Kusama'southward odd clothes, Kahlo's bed takes an everyday object, already loaded with its own symbolism — in the case of a clothes, femininity; in the case of a bed, sex, sickness and maternity — and infuses it with new meaning. Louise Conservative took her ain garments (discarded dresses, slips and nightwear) and repurposed them in her 1991 "Jail cell" serial' haunting, biomorphic sculptures. This, she seemed to say, is not what you think it is.
Mythmaking is part of whatever great artist's biography, sometimes at a detriment to the fine art. At the end of her life, when she was nearly blind from macular degeneration and could no longer pigment without assist, O'Keeffe traded art for fashion. Calvin Klein staged a 1984 advertising entrada at Ghost Ranch, 1 of O'Keeffe'south homes in New United mexican states, in which he tin be seen leaning against her fireplace, his optics shut in reverential homage to the woman whom coming together, he said, was like "a religious experience." Klein may take been genuine, but information technology was as if he was plundering a treasure that wasn't his to have. When O'Keeffe died in 1986, she ancestral her apparel to her estate. Her reasons, however personal, were non simply sentimental. O'Keeffe saw her wearing apparel as belonging to her body of work. "The painting," she wrote in 1963, "is similar a thread that runs through all the reasons for all the other things that make one's life."
Related: Floral Headpieces, Inspired by Female person Artists
Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2018/02/12/t-magazine/artists-outfits-uniforms.html